Start with one application. Extend to the estate when it has proven itself. Add the assurance layer when someone external starts asking for it.
One registered application on the fabric. The right way to prove sign-in, entitlement and revocation on something real before committing further.
The working shape for most organisations: the applications your people rely on daily, governed from one place under one policy.
For organisations answering to regulators, acquirers, or enterprise customers who bring their own control requirements to every renewal.
Every engagement begins with a scoping conversation. Nothing is agreed until both sides know exactly what is in scope.
Answered the way we would answer them on a call.
By how much of your estate the fabric governs and how much assurance you need around it. We agree the list of applications, the owners and the policy before anything is signed, so scope does not drift after the fact.
No, and we would advise against it. Estates come across in waves, sequenced around your change windows. Each wave inherits the policy already agreed rather than renegotiating it.
We tell you during scoping rather than after signing. If your estate is small enough that governed access is not yet worth the effort, that is a legitimate answer and you will hear it from us.
Your administrators, from one console. The console is unlisted, administrator rights are re-checked against the source of truth on every request, and every change is recorded.
The applications you want governed, the people who own them, and somebody empowered to decide entitlement policy. Nothing else.
Bring the list of applications nobody is certain about. Half an hour is usually enough to tell whether this is worth doing.
Book a conversation